What are the implications for our understanding of backsliding?
Theories of Backsliding
Hypotheses (1/3)
Leadership
State strength and autonomy (how leaders create it)
Role of elites in negotiating transitions, dividing power
Culture
Civic culture
Social capital and education
Hypotheses (2/3)
Specific types of political institutions
Presidential vs. parliamentary systems
Consociationalism (for divided societies)
Electoral institutions
PR vs SMD
If PR type of lists
Party fragmentation and instability (e.g. Indonesia)
International factors
International orgs (foreign aid, election monitoring, etc.)
Alliances (who are your friends?)
Hypotheses (3/3)
Social structures
Class (bourgeoisie, working class, etc.)
Ethnic fragmentation
Relevance of economic and political exclusion
Economic factors (see below)
Political Economy of Backsliding
Wealth
Exogenous Democratization
Rising wealth makes backsliding less likely
“No democracy was ever subverted in a country with a per capita income higher than Argentina in 1975: $6,055” (Przeworski)
Inequality
“Redistributivist” theory
Democracy is more durable in egalitarian societies
When the poor demand redistribution of elite’s wealth, elites react by “digging in their heels” because redistribution would be too drastic (Acemoglu and Robinson 2006)
Demands for redistribution are less in societies with lower inequality and societies where assets of elites are mobile (Boix
Competition from rising elites (Ansell and Samuels 2014)
Macroeconomic Performance
Literature especially focused on growth and inflation (Kapstein and Converse)
High growth rates \(\rightarrow\) less risk of backsliding
High inflation increases risk
Arguably more about regime stability than democracy